Sunday, June 20, 2004

The purpose of the Wisdom Project is to foster and promote wisdom. What does the search for wisdom have to do with politics and activism? How can discussion in a forum possibly lead to a better world?

The desperate state of our world calls us to action. Each of us has a responsibility to try to help at the deeper level of our common humanity. Unfortunately, humanity is too often sacrificed in defense of ideology. This is absolutely wrong. Political systems should actually benefit human beings, but, like money, they can control us instead of work for us. If with a warm heart and patience we can consider the views of others, and exchange ideas in calm discussion, we will find points of agreement. It is our responsibility-out of love and compassion for humankind-to seek harmony among nations, ideologies, cultures, ethnic groups, and economic and political systems. When we truly recognize the oneness of all humankind, our motivation to find peace will grow stronger. In the deepest sense we are really sisters and brothers, so we must share one another's suffering. Mutual respect, trust, and concern for one another's welfare are our best hope for lasting peace.

Of course, national leaders have a special responsibility in this area, but every individual must also take the initiative, regardless of religious belief. Just by being human, by seeking to gain happiness and avoid suffering, you are a citizen of this planet. We are all responsible for creating a better future.

-The Dalai Lama in How to Practice The Way to a Meaningful Life.

Monday, June 14, 2004

How can we challenge the Two Party System of Politics?
This question is a hot dialogue topic in the Wisdom Project. Several strong solutions have been discussed. I will add a new page to Wikiwisdom for each solution I find strongest.

First up: Proportional Representation

Quote from Wiki Wisdom:
Suppose a state has 10 seats in the house of representatives. Rather than having 10 separate elections in 10 separate sections of the state, have one election for all 10 seats, and have the seats given out to candidates in proportion to the number of votes they received. If 10 percent of the population votes for a third party candidate, then that candidate will have won a seat in congress. The typical results from such an election might be 4 Republican, 4 Democrats, 1 Green Party, and 1 Libertarian candidate win seats in the House of Representatives. Every political group in the state with at least 10% of the population's support, could gain a vote in congress...
This type of system would ensure the validity and power of the minority voices in the country. It would legitimize alternative viewpoints and breath a breath of fresh air into our current political process.


You are invited to go to the WikiWisdom page right now and help enhance the description and details of this solution.
If you want to debate the merits of the solution, visit the new thread for Proportional Representation.

Saturday, June 05, 2004

What is the difference between Bush and Kerry?

List the Issues in order of importance - and state the position of GW Bush and the position of John Kerry. If they have the same position, just say so.

I am asking about these two candidates, because in todays system, they are the only two real options. Sadly.

Economy, War on Terror, Iraq, Gay Marriage, Taxes, Healthcare (Medicare), Education, Other?

Go to the discussion.

Friday, June 04, 2004

Why Participate?
Do you discuss political ideas in online forums? If so, why? If not, why not? What is the value? What does it achieve? Is it a waste of energy or an effective way to change the world for the better? I look forward to your thoughts in this thread:
Why discuss politics in a forum?